gashed.net Report : Visit Site

Technical data of the gashed.net

Geo IP provides you such as latitude, longitude and ISP (Internet Service Provider) etc. informations. Our GeoIP service found where is host gashed.net. Currently, hosted in Bulgaria and its service provider is GetClouder EOOD .

the related websites

celestialnavigators.org the-crossword-solver.com everquest.allakhazam.com turnerink.co.uk bbc.co.uk amazon.com wordsforthewounded.co.uk barnesandnoble.com 

HTTP Header Analysis

HTTP Header information is a part of HTTP protocol that a user's browser sends to called nginx containing the details of what the browser wants and will accept back from the web server.

DNS

HtmlToText

| musings on education, technology & randomness in ireland.. home contact search: blog 2.0 hello, i've decided to have another go at blogging after a few years hiatus. hopefully i'll manage a bit better this time. any comments or advice will be greatfully recieved. thank you. category blogging (2) creativity (2) examination (4) miscellaneous (5) mobile technology (9) social media (1) teaching (14) technology (8) archive february 2012 june 2008 february 2008 august 2007 july 2007 posted on 28-02-2012 educating about social media filed under ( social media ) by gashed firstly, this is my fist attempt at blogging in a few years. buoyed on by an enjoyable cesi 2012 conference, i’ve decided to have another go. this post is this afternoon’s reflections on much of what i heard in presentations from steve wheeler , fred boss and particularly by catherine cronin on digital identity, privacy & authenticity . i have yet to look into the literature on this topic but hope to do so soon. these thoughts relate to how parents and educators can help second level students to learn about the rights, responsibilities, risks and rewards of engaging with social media, particularly the incredible popular facebook. in my experience there is an understandable worry amongst parents on how best to guide teenagers in this aspect of their lives. a lack of knowledge and experience means parents don’t have the confidence or vocabulary to discuss social media with their children, and struggle to deal with adverse situations when they arise. even those that have an understanding, but lack experience may struggle with the nuances of expression on social media. therefore increasingly schools are being asked by parents to become involved in dealing with teenagers and social networking and in dealing with specific situations that arise. schools are also involved because it seems that parents seem often not have the respect of the children when dealing with this area, where a disagreement around social media use can quickly escalate into a larger conflict. ironically, many of these disputes relate to private interactions between young people that parents and teachers never had any agency prior to the internet, however it seems that when there is social networking involved often it is felt that adult intervention is required. the response of parents is often to revert to the banning of access to social media; deciding that in the absence of their capacity to regulate and ensure that it is to be used in a safe and constructive manner, that these sites should not be used at all. schools also seem to shy away from allowing access to social networking, e.g. blocking facebook. given the ease of access to these sites from a variety of devices this banning of access will not be effective. furthermore, parents and teachers should appreciate that the use of social media will be an even more important aspect of children’s lives to come, as it’s essential they develop their personal, and ultimately professional, learning networks. however if parents are to enable children to harness these tools safely and successfully, it is important that they, and teachers, reflect on the nature of social networking, be clear on its positive and negative sides and develop a clear understanding on how these tools should be used. in order to attain an appreciation of social networking my advice to all parents would be to open a facebook and twitter account. if for no other reason than to understand the dynamics of how the pages operate and develop an understanding of the culture of the various social media options. these social media tools of expression are far from neutral; their design and functionality can promote and strongly influence how teenagers use these sites. facebook, the most used social networking site by irish teens, is a good example how functionality can facilitate certain behaviours. in facebook, with a click of the mouse, it is possible to be ‘excluding’, by not friending or defriending someone – therefore hiding your profile . this means it is very easy to form ‘cliques’, something that is feature of teenage life, but may be very hurtful. this is not as possible in twitter for example. also the actually methods of expression on facebook are quite formulaic, all profiles look the same due to this lack of capacity for creative expression. the creation and maintenance of an account follows a proscribed pattern. this in turn leads to much mimicry and tribal like behaviour, where all post the same type of pictures etc and even post using the same language. it is difficult for a uninformed child in this environment, to understand that the nature of their online profile may be as a result of the facebook culture and not authentic representation of themselves. in fact the capacity for authentic behaviour by teenagers in this environment is probably limited, particularly in front of people who down really know that well; it’s safer to go with the crowd. parents need to understand this in advising teenagers and analysing their profiles. the nature of a child’s expression on facebook may also be related to the fact that prior to being friended they basically represent themselves by a single profile picture. essentially this not a means of self-expression, but a marketing exercise in order to become rich in the currency of friends. in marketing themselves, their profile pictures, consistent with images used in much marketing, may be chosen to emphaisis the qualities that they feel a prospective friend would look for; in many cases they become over-sexualised or more adult in nature. parents should appreciate that this picture is not an expression of who the child wants to be or is, but who they feel others would ‘friend’. in fact it is often difficult for the child to define any other persona given such such a reductionist way as one picture. parents should also appreciate that the child is not expressing themselves in social media to the wider world, but, as they perceive it, to their peers or friends. parents should not rush to extrapolate from a child’s profile to what the full rounded picture of that child is. indeed if we reflect on our own lives it is understandable that we show different elements of our personalities with different social audiences. however, parents need to educate their children that there is a difference to developing a persona through interactions in the physical world to that in the virtual world. there is a persistence about what happens in the virtual world compared to that in the physical world; hard drives have longer memories than the average human. in facebook again, there is a difficultly in deleting old pictures and messages, and of course anyone who has seen these photos has potentially a copy. in aggregating social media sites such as facebook there seems to be a conflict between archived content and expressing your current feelings. all historical activities on the site can be easily accessed, especially with facebook’s new timeline feature, and be reused or used out of context. parents should help teenagers to understand that activities on social media sites have a permancy, although it is often difficult to get young people to project consequences into the future. incongruencies between a child’s persistent social media persona and their authentic self will lead to difficulties in the future. the museum of me site is an excellent way for a child to reflect on the permanency of their activities and the message that transmits. as part of this they should also understand that their facebook friends are not really friends in the traditional sense of the word. they are simply connections, but facebook’s loaded use of the term friend is misleading. they are not sharing their activities with actual friends. in contrast to facebook, twitter connections, i.e. followers, are earned rather than amassed; this is a different hierarchical relationship that confers additio

URL analysis for gashed.net

http://gashed.net/?p=28
http://gashed.net/index.php?tag=elonx
http://gashed.net/?p=48#comments
http://gashed.net/?m=200707
http://gashed.net/?m=200708
http://gashed.net/index.php?tag=wordle
http://gashed.net/index.php?tag=interactive-whiteboard
http://gashed.net/index.php?tag=701
http://gashed.net/index.php?tag=wind
http://gashed.net/?p=48#more-48
http://gashed.net/?p=39
http://gashed.net/index.php?tag=word-cloud
http://gashed.net/?p=39#comments
http://gashed.net/index.php?tag=mimio
http://gashed.net/index.php?tag=iwb
projected.co.uk
elonexone.co.uk

Whois Information

Whois is a protocol that is access to registering information. You can reach when the website was registered, when it will be expire, what is contact details of the site with the following informations. In a nutshell, it includes these informations;

Domain Name: GASHED.NET
Registry Domain ID: 1081241979_DOMAIN_NET-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.enom.com
Registrar URL: http://www.enom.com
Updated Date: 2018-06-27T05:13:57Z
Creation Date: 2007-07-12T08:28:26Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2019-07-12T08:28:26Z
Registrar: eNom, Inc.
Registrar IANA ID: 48
Registrar Abuse Contact Email:
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone:
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Name Server: NS1.SITEGROUND192.COM
Name Server: NS2.SITEGROUND192.COM
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of whois database: 2019-01-24T12:18:57Z <<<

For more information on Whois status codes, please visit https://icann.org/epp

NOTICE: The expiration date displayed in this record is the date the
registrar's sponsorship of the domain name registration in the registry is
currently set to expire. This date does not necessarily reflect the expiration
date of the domain name registrant's agreement with the sponsoring
registrar. Users may consult the sponsoring registrar's Whois database to
view the registrar's reported date of expiration for this registration.

TERMS OF USE: You are not authorized to access or query our Whois
database through the use of electronic processes that are high-volume and
automated except as reasonably necessary to register domain names or
modify existing registrations; the Data in VeriSign Global Registry
Services' ("VeriSign") Whois database is provided by VeriSign for
information purposes only, and to assist persons in obtaining information
about or related to a domain name registration record. VeriSign does not
guarantee its accuracy. By submitting a Whois query, you agree to abide
by the following terms of use: You agree that you may use this Data only
for lawful purposes and that under no circumstances will you use this Data
to: (1) allow, enable, or otherwise support the transmission of mass
unsolicited, commercial advertising or solicitations via e-mail, telephone,
or facsimile; or (2) enable high volume, automated, electronic processes
that apply to VeriSign (or its computer systems). The compilation,
repackaging, dissemination or other use of this Data is expressly
prohibited without the prior written consent of VeriSign. You agree not to
use electronic processes that are automated and high-volume to access or
query the Whois database except as reasonably necessary to register
domain names or modify existing registrations. VeriSign reserves the right
to restrict your access to the Whois database in its sole discretion to ensure
operational stability. VeriSign may restrict or terminate your access to the
Whois database for failure to abide by these terms of use. VeriSign
reserves the right to modify these terms at any time.

The Registry database contains ONLY .COM, .NET, .EDU domains and
Registrars.

  REGISTRAR eNom, Inc.

SERVERS

  SERVER net.whois-servers.net

  ARGS domain =gashed.net

  PORT 43

  TYPE domain

DOMAIN

  NAME gashed.net

  CHANGED 2018-06-27

  CREATED 2007-07-12

STATUS
clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited

NSERVER

  NS1.SITEGROUND192.COM 184.154.231.10

  NS2.SITEGROUND192.COM 184.154.231.110

  REGISTERED yes

Mistakes

The following list shows you to spelling mistakes possible of the internet users for the website searched .